One City. One Problem.

Episode 01 | Capital delivery

Rebuilding Main Street

One construction window. Decades of decisions.

The city gets one construction window. How does it coordinate the surface, subsurface, mobility, and public-realm decisions before the first excavator arrives?

Date
Wednesday, September 16, 2026
Time
1:00 – 2:30 PM ET
Duration
90 minutes, virtual
Reserve your seat
Illustration for Rebuilding Main Street

The situation

A city is preparing to rebuild a two-mile commercial corridor. The pavement is failing, underground records conflict, pedestrian access needs improvement, businesses cannot tolerate repeated disruption, and funding deadlines are approaching.

Everyone agrees the street needs work. The harder question is how to coordinate it before design choices become expensive commitments.

The decision

What must the city know, align, and sequence now so Main Street is opened once and rebuilt for the next generation?

Three expert contributions

Three disciplines, one shared decision node

01

Existing-conditions intelligence

How can the city establish a shared, measurable picture of the corridor before design begins?

Show how field capture, survey, imagery, mapping, or reality documentation can create a reliable baseline across departments. Focus on what must be captured, at what level of confidence, and how the baseline prevents downstream rework.

02

Subsurface and asset coordination

How can the city identify underground conflicts and renewal opportunities early enough to coordinate the work?

Show how records, detection, asset data, and engineering judgment combine to expose uncertainty. Clarify what can be known, what must be verified, and how departments and utilities should resolve conflicts.

03

Design, phasing, and public impact

How can the city turn the evidence into a buildable sequence that protects access, safety, budget, and long-term value?

Show how scenario planning, constructability, mobility, public-realm goals, and stakeholder constraints shape phasing. Focus on the decisions that should be locked early and those that should remain flexible.

What the roundtable will test

  • What must happen first?
  • What evidence is good enough to make a decision?
  • Where do workflows or data need to connect?
  • What can be done now, and what requires a longer program?
  • How should the city explain the recommendation to leadership and the public?

Roundtable prompt

The mayor asks for a recommendation in 30 days. What is the minimum coordinated work program needed before the city advances design?

You will leave with

  • A three-step decision path
  • A clearer view of roles and dependencies
  • Questions to ask internally and of potential partners
  • A concise event recap and resource sheet

Three-step takeaway

  1. 01Build one trusted corridor baseline.
  2. 02Resolve the highest-cost surface and subsurface conflicts.
  3. 03Approve a coordinated scope and disruption plan before final design.

Audience takeaway asset

Main Street Readiness Checklist

Ten questions to answer before design procurement or 30% design.

The 75-minute format

  1. 01 · 10 minutes

    The problem

    The moderator introduces the city, the stakes, the constraints, and the decision.

  2. 02 · 15 minutes each

    Three expert contributions

    Each expert answers one assigned question and shows one useful visual or example.

  3. 03 · 20 minutes

    Moderated roundtable

    The speakers connect the pieces, surface tradeoffs, and agree on sequence.

  4. 04 · 10 minutes

    Audience Q&A

    Attendees bring the problem into their own operating context.

  5. 05 · 5 minutes

    The takeaway

    The moderator closes with three practical next steps.

Speaker brief for this episode

What contributors prepare

City problem
A two-mile corridor must be rebuilt within one construction window while records, renewal needs, access, and public-realm goals compete.
Contribution roles
Existing-conditions intelligence; subsurface and asset coordination; design, phasing, and public impact.
Required visual
One corridor-scale evidence artifact — baseline, conflict map, option comparison, or phasing plan.
Roundtable preparation
Be ready to name the information you need from the other two contributors, the decision deadline it serves, and one risk of acting too early or too late.
Avoid
Showing a perfected “after” rendering without explaining the evidence and coordination needed to reach it.

Reserve your seat

All fields marked required are needed to confirm your registration.